Bug#755295: Hurd term server (was: Hurd GCC ping)
- To: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
- Cc: bug-hurd@gnu.org, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>, Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>, Thomas Bushnell <tb@becket.net>, 755295@bugs.debian.org, marcus.brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
- Subject: Bug#755295: Hurd term server (was: Hurd GCC ping)
- From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
- Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 18:13:11 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20141102171311.GS2991@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr>
- Mail-followup-to: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>, bug-hurd@gnu.org, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>, Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>, Thomas Bushnell <tb@becket.net>, 755295@bugs.debian.org, marcus.brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
- Reply-to: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>, 755295@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <87iojtpi1s.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net>
- References: <53CAA84C.6080301@debian.org> <53EDFDC1.9050205@ubuntu.com> <87vbpogj0r.fsf@schwinge.name> <87iojtpi1s.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net>
Thomas Schwinge, le Thu 09 Oct 2014 14:02:39 +0200, a écrit :
> #!/usr/bin/expect -f
>
> # Doesn't seem to matter.
> #stty -cooked
> stty cooked
>
> #spawn sh -c "/media/erich/home/thomas/tmp/gcc/755295.build/gcc/xgcc.real -B/media/erich/home/thomas/tmp/gcc/755295.build/gcc/ /media/erich/home/thomas/tmp/gcc/755295/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr33466.c -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -std=gnu99 -S -o pr33466.s 2> /tmp/e; cat < /tmp/e"
> spawn sh -c "cat < /tmp/e"
> #spawn sh -c "for i in \$(seq 1 99); do echo \$i \$(seq 0 50); done > /tmp/d; cat < /tmp/d"
> #spawn sh -c "for i in \$(seq 1 99); do echo \$i --------------------------------------------------------------------------; done > /tmp/d; cat < /tmp/d"
> #spawn printf "%4095d\r\nabc" 1
> #spawn printf "%4096d%4096d\r\nabc" 1 2
> interact
I don't manage to make this behave differently on Linux and on GNU/Hurd.
Which testcase should I be enabling above? What is supposed to be the
content of /tmp/e? It really seems to me the change I propose is the
right way, but I haven't yet managed to trigger a failure without it.
Samuel
Reply to: