[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#757153: gcc-4.9: FTBFS on arm64



Package: gcc-4.9
Followup-For: Bug #757153


OK. I got to the bottom of this problem. It's essentially the same as
a prevous patch I did for gcc-4.8 but now there is an
aarch64-acle-intrinsics.texi file as well as an
arm-acle-intrinsics.texi file and a placeholder copy of that has to be
present to stop the build barfing on Debian.

Attached is a patch that fixes the problem.

Can you please do an upload with this in ASAP as the only package that
is out of date (and thus got rejected in the initial upload to the
main debian archive) is now gcc-4.9. And we need that bootstrap set to
start the official buildds next week.

Thanks
diff -u gcc-4.9-4.9.1/debian/changelog gcc-4.9-4.9.1/debian/changelog
--- gcc-4.9-4.9.1/debian/changelog
+++ gcc-4.9-4.9.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+gcc-4.9 (4.9.1-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Ensure arm-acle-intrinsics.texi exists
+
+ -- Wookey <wookey@debian.org>  Sat, 09 Aug 2014 00:09:53 +0000
+
 gcc-4.9 (4.9.1-4) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * Update to SVN 20140731 (r213317) from the gcc-4_9-branch.
diff -u gcc-4.9-4.9.1/debian/rules.patch gcc-4.9-4.9.1/debian/rules.patch
--- gcc-4.9-4.9.1/debian/rules.patch
+++ gcc-4.9-4.9.1/debian/rules.patch
@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@
 #	$(if $(with_linaro_branch),,svn-doc-updates) \
 
 else
+  debian_patches += \
+	$(if $(with_linaro_branch),gcc-dfsg-linaro-doc)
+
 endif
 debian_patches += \
 	gcc-gfdl-build
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- gcc-4.9-4.9.1.orig/debian/patches/gcc-dfsg-linaro-doc.diff
+++ gcc-4.9-4.9.1/debian/patches/gcc-dfsg-linaro-doc.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+Index: gcc-4.9-4.9.1/src/gcc/doc/aarch64-acle-intrinsics.texi
+===================================================================
+--- /dev/null  1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
++++ gcc-4.9-4.9.1/src/gcc/doc/aarch64-acle-intrinsics.texi 2014-03-18 18:42:11.027303768 +0000
+@@ -0,0 +1 @@
++@c This file is empty because the original one has a non DFSG free license (GFDL)

Reply to: