[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#756251: gcc-defaults: or1k doesn't support java, please add to java_no_arch



We have a "stripped down" port of both, but they are not close to
ready for upstream.
However I'm curious how those are related to this bug? I cannot see
that this change would make it not dependent on those two.
Alternatively, are you saying that all we need to port GCJ is libgc
and libffi?
TBH I never dug into it (I have to draw the line somewhere), but if
that is the case it is no doubt worth spending some time polishing
those parts.

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote:
> Am 28.07.2014 um 01:53 schrieb Christian Svensson:
>> Package: gcc-defaults
>> Version: 1.130
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Tags: patch
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> OpenRISC does not have a Java port.
>> I would be grateful if it could be added to java_no_arches.
>>
>> I'm not sure if gcj49_arches should be modified, but java_no_arches
>> definitely should.
>
> sure, I can do this. however you really should give priority to port both libffi
> and libgc to or1k. It will bite you in many more places.
>
>   Matthias
>


Reply to: