[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#761277: gdc uninstallable on kfreebsd because of missing dep. libphobos-4.9-dev



Am 02.10.2014 um 20:41 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 06:10:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 07:34:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Am 12.09.2014 um 15:13 schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
>>>> While it's your prerogative to decrease the severity, please note that
>>>> this bug means that all the packages that build-depend on gdc (22
>>>> packages in jessie) are currently in an FTBFS-state on kfreebsd.
>>>
>>> sure, and they still will ftbfs without libphobos.
>>
>> There are a few others architectures which build gdc, but which do not
>> build libphobos-dev. What makes kfreebsd special there, and why do we
>> need this gdc -> libphobos-dev dependency (which wasn't there in
>> previous versions of the package)?
>>
>> For me it looks like a patch like the following one will fix the
>> problem:
>>
>> Index: rules
>> ===================================================================
>> --- rules	(révision 7672)
>> +++ rules	(copie de travail)
>> @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@
>>  go_archs = amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel \
>>  	powerpc ppc64 ppc64el s390 s390x x32
>>  
>> -phobos_archs = amd64 armel armhf i386 x32 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
>> +phobos_archs = amd64 armel armhf i386 x32
>>  
>>  ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), $(multilib_archs)))
>>    with_multilib = yes
>>
>> Of course having libphobos would be even better, but that can be done in
>> a later step.
> 
> As nobody shouted against my above proposal, I guess it's the way to go.
> I have just committed the change to the SVN. 
> 
> Matthias could you please upload it, or if you don't have time can I
> just upload it myself?

yes, on my list.


Reply to: