Bug#761612: marked as done ([libatomic1] Incomplete extended description)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:28:12 +0200
with message-id <542A77AC.1070702@debian.org>
and subject line Re: [libatomic1] Incomplete extended description
has caused the Debian Bug report #761612,
regarding [libatomic1] Incomplete extended description
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
761612: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=761612
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: [libatomic1] Incomplete extended description
- From: Filipus Klutiero <chealer@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:06:04 -0400
- Message-id: <54163B7C.1000100@gmail.com>
Package: libatomic1
Version: 4.9.1-13
Severity: minor
The extended description starts with:
library providing __atomic built-in functions.
By the way, the meaning of "__atomic", found in the short and the extended descriptions, is most unclear.
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
> By the way, the meaning of "__atomic", found in the short
> and the extended descriptions, is most unclear.
It says "__atomic built-in functions", not just "__atomic". I don't think the
package description is the place to describe the semantics of atomic functions.
See the standards or the gcc-4.9-doc packages instead for such documentation.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: