Bug#752757: libstdc++6: shared printers.py script is different for ARMEL and ARMHF for the same package version
it is not, have missed #752579 somehow
please close this one as duplicate
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:02:21 +0200
Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote:
> how is this different than #752579?
>
> Am 26.06.2014 12:12, schrieb Igor Bogomazov:
> > Package: libstdc++6
> > Version: 4.9.0-7
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > it is impossible to install the package for both armel and armhf
> > because the shared file is different in them:
> >
> > libstdc++6_4.9.0-7_armel.deb
> > libstdc++6_4.9.0-7_armhf.deb
> >
> > md5sum:
> >
> > 1b83b0b9896053a8206a076826e33de2
> > armel/usr/share/gcc-4.9/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py
> > 12ca90f036a8ac1bde4a3f33a4f2f59c
> > armhf/usr/share/gcc-4.9/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py
> >
> > this is the issue with installing the packages as dpkg reports:
> >
> > dpkg: error processing
> > archive /var/cache/apt/archives/libstdc++6_4.9.0-7_armhf.deb
> > (--unpack): trying to overwrite shared
> > '/usr/share/gcc-4.9/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py', which is
> > different from other instances of package libstdc++6:armhf
> >
> > the armhf version of the script looks better, pretty sure it will
> > work in armel as well; can it be the same for both architectures?
> >
> > -- System Information:
> > Debian Release: jessie/sid
> > APT prefers testing
> > APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'),
> > (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> > Foreign Architectures: i386
> >
> > Kernel: Linux 3.14.2-ygrex-mac (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> >
> > Versions of packages libstdc++6 depends on:
> > ii gcc-4.9-base 4.9.0-7
> > ii libc6 2.19-3
> > ii libgcc1 1:4.9.0-7
> > ii multiarch-support 2.19-3
> >
> > libstdc++6 recommends no packages.
> >
> > libstdc++6 suggests no packages.
> >
> > -- no debconf information
> >
> >
--
Sincerely yours,
Igor Bogomazov
Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Reply to: