--- Begin Message ---
Package: libstdc++6
Version: 4.9.0-3
Severity: important
Control: affects -1 gdb
Dear doko,
On May 6, you NMU'd gdb to make it build against Python 3. Which would
be all well and good, except for one thing: the pretty-printers for
libstdc++ are *still* using Python 2 syntax.
(Any particular reason you couldn't have updated the printers to be
python3-compatible *before* doing the NMU?)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages libstdc++6 depends on:
ii gcc-4.9-base 4.9.0-3
ii libc6 2.18-4
ii libgcc1 1:4.9.0-3
ii multiarch-support 2.17-97
libstdc++6 recommends no packages.
libstdc++6 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.9.0-3
Am 16.05.2014 03:52, schrieb Samuel Bronson:
> On May 6, you NMU'd gdb to make it build against Python 3. Which would
> be all well and good, except for one thing: the pretty-printers for
> libstdc++ are *still* using Python 2 syntax.
>
> (Any particular reason you couldn't have updated the printers to be
> python3-compatible *before* doing the NMU?)
They are. Please check before filing such reports. If there is a problem, please
report it properly. I don't think the style of this report is the best way forward.
--- End Message ---