[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#730475: marked as done (gcc-doc: Unable to find node referenced by `gcc-4.7' in `(dir)Top'.)

Your message dated Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:22:57 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <Pine.BSM.4.64L.1403051321570.16009@herc.mirbsd.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#730475: gcc-doc: Unable to find node referenced by `gcc-4.7' in `(dir)Top'.
has caused the Debian Bug report #730475,
regarding gcc-doc: Unable to find node referenced by `gcc-4.7' in `(dir)Top'.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
730475: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730475
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: gcc-doc
Version: 5:4.8.0-1
Severity: normal

Hi,

after upgrading gcc-doc (with gcc-4.8-doc installed) and autoremoving
gcc-4.7-doc, “info gcc” no longer works:

「Unable to find node referenced by `gcc-4.7' in `(dir)Top'.」

I think you missed one place where the outdated gcc-4.7-doc is
referenced.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.11-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/lksh

Versions of packages gcc-doc depends on:
ii  gcc-4.8-doc  4.8.2-1

gcc-doc recommends no packages.

gcc-doc suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Guo Yixuan dixit:

>(sorry, but the previous mail seems to be rejected.)

Probably because you’re using Googlemail, who have proven, time
and time again, that they’re too clueless to be allowed to run
a public mailservice.

>I still can't understand this problem. However, the new 5:6 upload has a
>new way of handling info links, and it'll probably fix this bug.

It no longer occurs on my system, at least. I’ll close the bug.

Thanks,
//mirabilos
-- 
<mirabilos> Owāte Jong… isch owāte disch gleisch…
<Natureshadow> Ich kenn nur Oblate
<mirabilos> Lernenz Platt
<Natureshadow> Ich bin zu dick für Platt

--- End Message ---
Reply to: