[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Bug middle-end/19430] taking address of a var causes missing uninitialized warning


Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
            Summary|V_MAY_DEF (taking address   |taking address of a var
                   |of var) causes missing      |causes missing
                   |uninitialized warning       |uninitialized warning
           Severity|minor                       |enhancement

--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Well, fact is we still don't have the machinery that warns for the use of
uninitialized memory - and we never had.  The cases that work by
accident are for loads that alias-analysis can prove we can move to
the function entry (well, a little less than that).

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Reply to: