Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org (was bts-link-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #336511 (http://bugs.debian.org/336511)
> # Bug title: [PR libmudflap/24619] mudflap instrumentation of dlopen is incorrect
> # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24619
> # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED
> # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> WONTFIX
> # * upstream said bug is wontfix
> tags 336511 + upstream wontfix
Bug #336511 [gcc-snapshot] [PR libmudflap/24619] mudflap instrumentation of dlopen is incorrect
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> usertags 336511 - status-ASSIGNED
Usertags were: status-ASSIGNED.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 336511 + status-RESOLVED resolution-WONTFIX
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-WONTFIX status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #507515 (http://bugs.debian.org/507515)
> # Bug title: [PR libmudflap/24619] mudflap instrumentation of dlopen is incorrect
> # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24619
> # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED
> # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> WONTFIX
> # * upstream said bug is wontfix
> tags 507515 + upstream wontfix
Bug #507515 [gcc-snapshot] [PR libmudflap/24619] mudflap instrumentation of dlopen is incorrect
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> usertags 507515 - status-ASSIGNED
Usertags were: status-ASSIGNED.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 507515 + status-RESOLVED resolution-WONTFIX
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-WONTFIX status-RESOLVED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
336511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=336511
507515: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507515
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
Reply to: