Bug#724865: gcc-4.8 also affected

[Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>]

Am 31.10.2013 08:38, schrieb Johannes Schauer:
> Hi,
> 
> Quoting Matthias Klose (2013-10-30 20:27:20)
>> Am 30.10.2013 16:55, schrieb Johannes Schauer:
>>> I just wanted to mention that src:gcc-4.8 seems to be affected by the same
>>> problem.
>>
>> I don't see that gcc-4.8 is affected.
> 
> the problem with this bug (gcc-4.6) is that gcc-4.6 build-conflicts with
> binutils-gold. binutils-gold is a virtual package provided by binutils. gcc-4.6
> build-depends on binutils and thus the conflict with gcc-4.6.
> 
> gcc-4.8 also build-conflicts with binutils-gold and build-depends on binutils.
> Therefore it is logical that it should also not be buildable.
> 
> Here is the dose3 output for building gcc-4.8 on Debian Sid:
> 
> _build/applications/deb-buildcheck.native --checkonly=gcc-4.8 --explain --failures --deb-native-arch=i386 ~/debian-sid-i386/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_main_binary-i386_Packages ~/debian-sid-i386/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_main_source_Sources
> native-architecture: i386
> report:
>  -
>   package: src:gcc-4.8
>   version: 4.8.1-3
>   architecture: any,all
>   essential: false
>   source: gcc-4.8 (= 4.8.1-3)
>   status: broken
>   reasons:
>    -
>     conflict:
>      pkg1:
>       package: src:gcc-4.8
>       version: 4.8.1-3
>       architecture: any,all
>       essential: false
>       source: gcc-4.8 (= 4.8.1-3)
>       unsat-conflict: i386:--virtual-binutils-gold
>      pkg2:
>       package: i386:binutils
>       version: 2.23.90.20131017-1
>       architecture: i386
>       essential: false
>       source: binutils (= 2.23.90.20131017-1)
>      depchain2:
>       -
>        depchain:
>         -
>          package: src:gcc-4.8
>          version: 4.8.1-3
>          architecture: any,all
>          essential: false
>          depends: i386:debhelper (>= 5.0.62)
>         -
>          package: i386:debhelper
>          version: 9.20130921
>          architecture: all
>          essential: false
>          depends: i386:binutils
>  
> background-packages: 60748
> foreground-packages: 20218
> broken-packages: 1
> 
> 
> If this output is wrong then either was the problem fixed a day or so ago (I
> only created the chroot the day before yesterday) or dose3 is wrong (in which
> case I have to fix it).

you didn't check unstable.