--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: weird /usr/share/doc/gcc-doc/README
- From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
- Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:18:17 +0100
- Message-id: <20091106131817.17867.93738.reportbug@north.ext.tana.it>
Package: gcc-doc
Version: 5:2
Severity: wishlist
The last two line in /usr/share/doc/gcc-doc/README read
However, for pople who needs the documentation, it is
available from non-free section of the Debian archive.
"Pople"? Must be a curious race, perhaps leaving on
poplars, for some reason they need documentation :-)
Beside the typo, I wonder how incompatible are the
licences for gcc and gcc-doc to one another if it
is possible to get gcc but not gcc-doc. At the very
least, the README should say where the docs actually
are. Since "non-free" is in my sources.list, why did
I get this place holder att all?
Wasn't this stuff going to be fixed after GPLv3?
TIA
Ale
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (800, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26ale9 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages gcc-doc depends on:
ii gcc-4.3-doc 4.3.2.nf1-1 documentation for the GNU compiler
gcc-doc recommends no packages.
gcc-doc suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---