[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#711558: gcc-4.8: [m68k] patch set 2



Hi!

Despite mentioning PR52306 in the changelog (as I did)
you seem to have rejected pr52306-retry-hack.diff which
is a bit unfortunate as we really need a workaround for
that ICE to build some things in the archive, e.g. Qt4,
Qt5 and anything using it, mcabber, etc.

Do you outright reject this patch even if it’s just
“for the time being”? If so, would you accept a patch
that just disables -fauto-inc-dec on m68k *always*,
even in the cases where it doesn’t ICE? (one-liner)

Please apply the attached patch for now, to fix this
documentation issue (and another one):

Index: debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- debian/changelog	(revision 6947)
+++ debian/changelog	(working copy)
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
     - m68k-revert-pr45144: Needed for Ada.
     - pr52714: Revert optimisation that breaks CC0 arch.
   * Fix PR49847 (Mikael Pettersson). Closes: #711558.
-  * Use -fno-auto-inc-dec for PR52306 (Mikael Pettersson).
 
  -- Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>  Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:32:54 +0200
 
Index: debian/control.m4
===================================================================
--- debian/control.m4	(revision 6947)
+++ debian/control.m4	(working copy)
@@ -83,8 +83,8 @@
 ', `dnl
 Homepage: http://gcc.gnu.org/
 ')dnl SRCNAME
-XS-Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/gcccvs/branches/sid/gcc`'PV/
-XS-Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/gcccvs/branches/sid/gcc`'PV
+XS-Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/gcccvs/branches/sid/gcc`'PV/
+XS-Vcs-Svn: svn://anonscm.debian.org/svn/gcccvs/branches/sid/gcc`'PV
 
 ifelse(regexp(SRCNAME, `gcc-snapshot'),0,`dnl
 Package: gcc-snapshot`'TS



Thanks,
//mirabilos
-- 
«MyISAM tables -will- get corrupted eventually. This is a fact of life. »
“mysql is about as much database as ms access” – “MSSQL at least descends
from a database” “it's a rebranded SyBase” “MySQL however was born from a
flatfile and went downhill from there” – “at least jetDB doesn’t claim to
be a database”	‣‣‣ Please, http://deb.li/mysql and MariaDB, finally die!


Reply to: