[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#670264: marked as done (gcc-snapshot: should be buildable with binutils-gold installed)

Your message dated Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:25:52 +0200
with message-id <20130723142552.GA31174@ypig.lip.ens-lyon.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#670264: gcc-snapshot: should be buildable with binutils-gold installed
has caused the Debian Bug report #670264,
regarding gcc-snapshot: should be buildable with binutils-gold installed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
670264: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670264
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20120407-1
Severity: wishlist

I can't build gcc-snapshot if binutils-gold is installed:

ypig:...snapshot-20120407> dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc
dpkg-buildpackage: source package gcc-snapshot
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 20120407-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64
 dpkg-source --before-build gcc-snapshot-20120407
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Build conflicts: binutils-gold
dpkg-buildpackage: warning: Build dependencies/conflicts unsatisfied; aborting.
dpkg-buildpackage: warning: (Use -d flag to override.)

It is annoying to remove a package just because to build some
other package.

BTW, binutils-gold just does a divert. There should be a way to
choose the wanted linker.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages gcc-snapshot depends on:
ii  binutils            2.22-6+local1
ii  libasound2          1.0.25-2
ii  libatk1.0-0         2.4.0-2
ii  libc6               2.13-30
ii  libc6-dev           2.13-30
ii  libc6-dev-i386      2.13-30
ii  libc6-i386          2.13-30
ii  libcairo2           1.10.2-7
ii  libcloog-ppl0       0.15.11-4
ii  libecj-java         3.5.1-4
ii  libfontconfig1      2.8.0-3.1
ii  libfreetype6        2.4.9-1
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0  2.26.1-1
ii  libglib2.0-0        2.32.0-4
ii  libgmp10            2:5.0.4+dfsg-1
ii  libgmpxx4ldbl       2:5.0.4+dfsg-1
ii  libgtk2.0-0         2.24.10-1
ii  libice6             2:1.0.8-2
ii  libmpc2             0.9-4
ii  libmpfr4            3.1.0-4
ii  libpango1.0-0       1.30.0-1
ii  libppl-c4           0.11.2-6
ii  libppl9             0.11.2-6
ii  libpwl5             0.11.2-6
ii  libsm6              2:1.2.1-2
ii  libxrandr2          2:1.3.2-2
ii  libxrender1         1:0.9.7-1
ii  libxtst6            2:1.2.0-4
ii  python              2.7.2-10
ii  zlib1g              1:1.2.6.dfsg-2

gcc-snapshot recommends no packages.

Versions of packages gcc-snapshot suggests:
ii  binutils-gold  2.22-6+local1

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2012-04-24 16:23:01 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: gcc-snapshot
> Version: 20120407-1
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> I can't build gcc-snapshot if binutils-gold is installed:
[...]

This RFE is now obsolete since binutils-gold is no longer built:

binutils (2.23.52.20130722-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream snapshot.
    - Fix PR ld/15762, glibc being built without warning sections.
  * Set the libdir for arm64 to lib, not lib64.
  * Stop building the binutils-gold package, let binutils provide
    binutils-gold.  Packages requiring gold should explicity pass
    -fuse-ld=gold to the compiler, packages requiring the bfd linker
    should pass -fuse-ld=bfd to the compiler.
  * Refresh patches.

 -- Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>  Mon, 22 Jul 2013 21:13:32 +0200

Closing.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: