[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#707387: gcc-4.4: FTBFS: ../../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/config/i386/linux-unwind.h:138: error: field 'info' has incomplete type



Source: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.7-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130509 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/./gcc/xgcc -B/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/./gcc/ -B/usr/x86_64-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/x86_64-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/x86_64-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys-include -g -O2 -m32 -O2  -g -O2 -DIN_GCC   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wold-style-definition  -isystem ./include  -fPIC -g -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED   -I. -I. -I../../.././gcc -I../../../../src/libgcc -I../../../../src/libgcc/. -I../../../../src/libgcc/../gcc -I../../../../src/libgcc/../include -I../../../../src/libgcc/config/libbid -DENABLE_DECIMAL_BID_FORMAT -DHAVE_CC_TLS -DUSE_TLS -o unwind-dw2.o -MT unwind-dw2.o -MD -MP -MF unwind-dw2.dep -fexceptions -c ../../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/unwind-dw2.c -fvisibility=hidden -DHIDE_EXPORTS
> In file included from ../../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/unwind-dw2.c:333:
> ../../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/config/i386/linux-unwind.h: In function 'x86_fallback_frame_state':
> ../../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/config/i386/linux-unwind.h:138: error: field 'info' has incomplete type
> make[7]: *** [unwind-dw2.o] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2013/05/09/gcc-4.4_4.4.7-3_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.


Reply to: