[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#688330: gcc-4.7-base: WTF are you doing to the binary packages?



Package: gcc-4.7-base
Version: 4.7.2-1
Severity: serious

I don’t quite can believe this. What the hey are you doing with
your binary packages you officially upload to Debian, to get THIS?

Fetched 187 MB in 49s (3766 kB/s)
Reading changelogs...
Extracting templates from packages: 100%
(Reading database ... 79415 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace gcc-4.7-base:amd64 4.7.1-9 (using .../gcc-4.7-base_4.7.2-1_amd64.deb) ...
De-configuring gcc-4.7-base:i386 ...
Unpacking replacement gcc-4.7-base:amd64 ...
Preparing to replace gcc-4.7-base:i386 4.7.1-9 (using .../gcc-4.7-base_4.7.2-1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement gcc-4.7-base:i386 ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/pbuilder/aptcache/gcc-4.7-base_4.7.2-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.7-base/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package gcc-4.7-base:i386
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/pbuilder/aptcache/gcc-4.7-base_4.7.2-1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Oh, and indeed:

--- /tmp/clog-amd64	2012-09-21 17:28:40.002638617 +0000
+++ /tmp/clog-i386	2012-09-21 17:28:49.766650387 +0000
@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
   * GCC 4.7.2 release.
   * Issues addressed after the release candidate:
     - PR c++/53661 (wrong warning), LTO backport from trunk, documentation fix.
-  * Update NEWS files.
 
  -- Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>  Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:19:07 +0200
 

Really, why do you upload binary packages that are *obviously* not
built from the source package you upload?


Note to anyone whose Multi-Arch is suffering from this, and who run
into this issue, a quick hack/würgaround:

tg@zigo:~ $ sudo rm /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.7-base/changelog.Debian.gz
tg@zigo:~ $ sudo apt-get --purge -f install

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
Support mksh as /bin/sh and RoQA dash NOW!
‣ src:bash (250 (270) bugs: 1 (2) RC, 175 (189) I&N, 74 (79) M&W, 0 F&P)
‣ src:dash (78 (90) bugs: 4 RC, 32 (36) I&N, 42 (50) M&W, 0 F&P)
‣ src:mksh (1 bug: 0 RC, 0 I&N, 1 M&W, 0 F&P)
http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/d/dash.png is pretty red, innit?


Reply to: