[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#680590: gcc-4.7: FTBTS on lucid



Package: gcc-4.7
Version: 4.7.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

The attached patches allow me to build 4.7.1-3 for amd64 on lucid, using the
upstream FSF tarball.  Some of the below patches fix bit rot, some fix
mistaken assumptions about lucid, and I think some of them may be just
wrong.  Please advise.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages gcc-4.7 depends on:
ii  binutils      2.22-7
ii  cpp-4.7       4.7.1-3
ii  gcc-4.7-base  4.7.1-3
ii  libc6         2.13-34
ii  libgcc1       1:4.7.1-3
ii  libgmp10      2:5.0.5+dfsg-2
ii  libgomp1      4.7.1-3
ii  libitm1       4.7.1-3
ii  libmpc2       0.9-4
ii  libmpfr4      3.1.0-5
ii  libquadmath0  4.7.1-3
ii  zlib1g        1:1.2.7.dfsg-13

Versions of packages gcc-4.7 recommends:
ii  libc6-dev  2.13-34

Versions of packages gcc-4.7 suggests:
ii  binutils-gold        2.22-7
pn  gcc-4.7-doc          <none>
pn  gcc-4.7-locales      <none>
pn  gcc-4.7-multilib     <none>
pn  libgcc1-dbg          <none>
pn  libgomp1-dbg         <none>
pn  libitm1-dbg          <none>
ii  libmudflap0-4.7-dev  4.7.1-3
pn  libmudflap0-dbg      <none>
pn  libquadmath0-dbg     <none>

-- no debconf information
diff -ru 3/debian/control.m4 gcc-4.7-4.7.1/debian/control.m4
--- 3/debian/control.m4	2012-07-06 17:34:33.624172652 -0700
+++ gcc-4.7-4.7.1/debian/control.m4	2012-06-24 14:55:50.133581721 -0700
@@ -185,8 +185,11 @@
 Section: debug
 Priority: extra
 Depends: BASEDEP, libgcc1`'LS (= ${gcc:EpochVersion}), ${misc:Depends}
-ifdef(`TARGET',`dnl',ifdef(`MULTIARCH', `Multi-Arch: same'))
-ifdef(`TARGET',`dnl',`Provides: libgcc1-dbg-armel [armel], libgcc1-dbg-armhf [armhf]')
+ifdef(`TARGET',`dnl',`dnl
+ifdef(`MULTIARCH',`Multi-Arch: same
+')dnl
+Provides: libgcc1-dbg-armel [armel], libgcc1-dbg-armhf [armhf]
+')dnl
 Description: GCC support library (debug symbols)`'ifdef(`TARGET)',` (TARGET)', `')
  Debug symbols for the GCC support library.
 ifdef(`TARGET', `dnl
diff -ru 3/debian/patches/gcc-multilib64-multiarch.diff gcc-4.7-4.7.1/debian/patches/gcc-multilib64-multiarch.diff
--- 3/debian/patches/gcc-multilib64-multiarch.diff	2012-07-06 17:34:33.864169777 -0700
+++ gcc-4.7-4.7.1/debian/patches/gcc-multilib64-multiarch.diff	2012-06-24 15:31:43.473981030 -0700
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
 +++ b/src/gcc/config/rs6000/t-linux64
 @@ -33,6 +33,6 @@
  MULTILIB_EXTRA_OPTS     = fPIC mstrict-align
- MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS     =
- MULTILIB_EXCLUSIONS     =
+ MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS     = m64/msoft-float
+ MULTILIB_EXCLUSIONS     = m64/!m32/msoft-float
 -MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES	= ../lib64$(call if_multiarch,:powerpc64-linux-gnu)
 +MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES	= ../lib$(call if_multiarch,:powerpc64-linux-gnu)
  MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES    += $(if $(wildcard $(shell echo $(SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR))/../../usr/lib32),../lib32,../lib)$(call if_multiarch,:powerpc-linux-gnu)
diff -ru 3/debian/rules.conf gcc-4.7-4.7.1/debian/rules.conf
--- 3/debian/rules.conf	2012-07-06 17:34:33.613661244 -0700
+++ gcc-4.7-4.7.1/debian/rules.conf	2012-07-06 17:47:57.183934519 -0700
@@ -264,14 +264,6 @@
   LIBUNWIND_DEV_DEP := # nothing
 endif
 
-ifneq (,$(filter $(distrelease),lenny etch squeeze dapper hardy jaunty karmic lucid maverick natty))
-  GMP_BUILD_DEP = libgmp3-dev,
-  MPFR_BUILD_DEP = libmpfr-dev,
-else
-  GMP_BUILD_DEP = libgmp-dev (>= 2:5.0.1~),
-  MPFR_BUILD_DEP = libmpfr-dev (>= 3.0.0-9~),
-endif
-
 cloog_parma =
 ifeq ($(trunk_build),yes)
   PPL_BUILD_DEP = libisl-dev,
@@ -287,6 +279,16 @@
   # FIXME: currently not dl'opened.
   #CLOOG_RUNTIME_DEP = libcloog-ppl0 (>= 0.15.9-2~), libppl-c2, libppl7
 endif
+
+GMP_BUILD_DEP = libgmp-dev (>= 2:5.0.1~),
+MPFR_BUILD_DEP = libmpfr-dev (>= 3.0.0-9~),
+ifneq (,$(filter $(distrelease),lenny etch squeeze dapper hardy jaunty karmic lucid maverick natty))
+  ifeq ($(cloog_parma),yes)
+    GMP_BUILD_DEP = libgmp3-dev,
+    MPFR_BUILD_DEP = libmpfr-dev,
+  endif
+endif
+
 MPC_BUILD_DEP = libmpc-dev,
 ELF_BUILD_DEP = libelfg0-dev (>= 0.8.12),
 
diff -ru 3/debian/rules.defs gcc-4.7-4.7.1/debian/rules.defs
--- 3/debian/rules.defs	2012-07-06 17:34:33.613661244 -0700
+++ gcc-4.7-4.7.1/debian/rules.defs	2012-06-24 14:55:50.144185903 -0700
@@ -285,9 +285,11 @@
 # build using fsf or linaro
 ifeq ($(distribution),Ubuntu)
   ifeq (,$(findstring gnat, $(PKGSOURCE)))
-  ifneq (,$(findstring $(DEB_TARGET_ARCH),armel armhf amd64 i386 powerpc))
-    with_linaro_branch = yes
-  endif
+    ifneq (,$(findstring $(DEB_TARGET_ARCH),armel armhf amd64 i386 powerpc))
+# UB:linaro patch is borked
+#      with_linaro_branch = yes
+# UB linaro patch is borked
+    endif
   endif
 endif
 
diff -ru 3/debian/rules.patch gcc-4.7-4.7.1/debian/rules.patch
--- 3/debian/rules.patch	2012-07-06 17:34:33.633662668 -0700
+++ gcc-4.7-4.7.1/debian/rules.patch	2012-07-06 17:47:57.183934519 -0700
@@ -249,10 +249,10 @@
 else
   debian_patches += gcc-multiarch$(if $(with_linaro_branch),-linaro)
 endif
-ifneq ($(GFDL_INVARIANT_FREE),yes)
-  debian_patches += gcc-multiarch-doc
-endif
 ifeq ($(with_multiarch_lib),yes)
+  ifneq ($(GFDL_INVARIANT_FREE),yes)
+    debian_patches += gcc-multiarch-doc
+  endif
   ifneq ($(single_package),yes)
     debian_patches += libjava-multiarch
   endif
@@ -264,14 +264,12 @@
     debian_patches += cross-biarch
   endif
 endif
-debian_patches += gcc-powerpc-nof
+ifeq ($(with_multiarch_lib),yes)
+  debian_patches += gcc-powerpc-nof
+endif
 debian_patches += gcc-powerpc-undef
 ifeq ($(biarch32),yes)
-  ifeq ($(with_multiarch_lib),yes)
-    debian_patches += gcc-multilib64-multiarch
-  else
-    debian_patches += gcc-multilib64
-  endif
+  debian_patches += gcc-multilib64-multiarch
 endif
 
 ifeq (,$(filter $(distrelease),lenny squeeze dapper hardy intrepid jaunty karmic lucid maverick))

Reply to: