Re: Bug#657157: any resolution 657157 important for pytables coming?
Hi Steve et al,
let me share a piece of news and please let me know if that is
possible that the issue was actually actually an alignment issue while
presenting itself as illop? Does alignment also concerns code blocks
and somehow incorrect opcode was read or what was it? sorry for such a
naive question
Julian Talylor was fixing alignment issue for pytables on arm in
Ubuntu, and I confused his patch considering he was fixing the illop...
I have logged in into harris where I still had that code built -- and
now it was crashing with "bus error", not "ill op"...
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > >I wonder if someone could look into this issue since it forbids
> > >build/use of pytables on armhf disallowing migration to testing.
> > >References: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657157
> > the upstream report is about an ice-on-invalid-code, the pytables
> > issue is about a test failure (wrong code?)
> if I get it right: no -- the issue is the same. the code excerpt Steve
> has provided is from (or based on code from) pytables. This issue
> got revealed indeed through running pytables test suite at build time,
> which allowed for it to be detected. So, unless it gets fixed, pytables
> would keep FTBFS due to the failing unittests.
--
=------------------------------------------------------------------=
Keep in touch www.onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic
Reply to: