Bug#647324: gcj-4.6: Wrong MULTIARCH_DIRNAME on powerpcspe (is "powerpc-linux-gnu")

To: "647324@bugs.debian.org" <647324@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Bug#647324: gcj-4.6: Wrong MULTIARCH_DIRNAME on powerpcspe (is "powerpc-linux-gnu")
From: "Moffett, Kyle D" <Kyle.D.Moffett@boeing.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 15:09:54 -0500
Message-id: <A5981543-6B2D-42B6-8C32-801C5917F8B2@boeing.com>
Reply-to: "Moffett, Kyle D" <Kyle.D.Moffett@boeing.com>, 647324@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <handler.647324.B.132018230528936.ack@bugs.debian.org>
References: <20111101211817.10087.90612.reportbug@philyra.exmeritus.com> <handler.647324.B.132018230528936.ack@bugs.debian.org>

Hello,

I have verified that gcc-4.6 and gcj-4.6 both build successfully
on "powerpcspe" with that patch.  It turns out gcj needs to build
an embedded copy of libffi (is that OK under Debian policy?), so
I also had to apply the new libffi patch in #647288 [1].

This patch modifies a case conditional that only applies for SPE,
so it should be safe to merge into the existing multiarch patch.

Thanks for your time!

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/647288

--
Curious about my work on the Debian powerpcspe port?
I'm keeping a blog here: http://pureperl.blogspot.com/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#647324: gcj-4.6: Wrong MULTIARCH_DIRNAME on powerpcspe (is "powerpc-linux-gnu")
  - From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#647324: gcj-4.6: Wrong MULTIARCH_DIRNAME on powerpcspe (is "powerpc-linux-gnu")
  - From: Kyle Moffett <Kyle.D.Moffett@boeing.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#647425: g++-4.6: warn_unused_result error triggerd even if casted
Next by Date: Bug#647456: gcc-defaults: Make GCC 4.6 the default on the "powerpcspe" architecture
Previous by thread: Bug#647324: gcj-4.6: Wrong MULTIARCH_DIRNAME on powerpcspe (is "powerpc-linux-gnu")
Next by thread: Bug#647324: gcj-4.6: Wrong MULTIARCH_DIRNAME on powerpcspe (is "powerpc-linux-gnu")
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread