[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#642413: marked as done ([gcc-4.6] Please adopt the patches of ibm-branch.diff etc. on Debian ppc64, too.)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:54:58 +0200
with message-id <4EA41CB2.3050007@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#642413: [gcc-4.6] Please adopt the patches of ibm-branch.diff etc. on Debian ppc64, too.
has caused the Debian Bug report #642413,
regarding [gcc-4.6] Please adopt the patches of ibm-branch.diff etc. on Debian ppc64, too.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
642413: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642413
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: gcc-4.6
Version: 4.6.1-11
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Please adopt the patches of ibm-branch.diff etc. on Debian ppc64, too, not only Ubuntu.
When an attached patch is applied, it is confirmed that the package can be built.
-- 
Hiroyuki Yamamoto
A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA  91AC 3A10 59C6 5203 04DC

diff -Nurd gcc-4.6-4.6.1.orig/debian/rules.patch gcc-4.6-4.6.1/debian/rules.patch
--- gcc-4.6-4.6.1.orig/debian/rules.patch	2011-09-22 21:47:13.000000000 +0900
+++ gcc-4.6-4.6.1/debian/rules.patch	2011-09-22 21:48:30.000000000 +0900
@@ -98,11 +98,7 @@
   endif
 endif
 ifeq ($(with_ssp)-$(with_ssp_default),yes-yes)
-  ifeq ($(distribution),Ubuntu)
-    hardening_patches += gcc-default-ssp$(if $(filter ppc64,$(DEB_TARGET_ARCH)),-ppc64)
-  else
-    hardening_patches += gcc-default-ssp
-  endif
+  hardening_patches += gcc-default-ssp$(if $(filter ppc64,$(DEB_TARGET_ARCH)),-ppc64)
 endif
 
 # FIXME 4.5: Drop and adjust symbols files
@@ -191,9 +187,7 @@
 endif
 
 ifeq ($(DEB_TARGET_ARCH),ppc64)
-  ifeq ($(distribution),Ubuntu)
-    debian_patches += ibm-branch
-  endif
+  debian_patches += ibm-branch
 endif
 
 ifeq ($(DEB_CROSS),yes)
@@ -271,10 +265,8 @@
   debian_patches += gcc-as-needed
 endif
 debian_patches += mips-fix-loongson2f-nop
-ifeq ($(distribution),Ubuntu)
-  ifeq ($(DEB_TARGET_ARCH),ppc64)
-    debian_patches += gcc-ppc64-O3
-  endif
+ifeq ($(DEB_TARGET_ARCH),ppc64)
+  debian_patches += gcc-ppc64-O3
 endif
 debian_patches += gcc-system-root
 debian_patches += libgomp-kfreebsd-testsuite

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 09/22/2011 04:19 PM, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
> (2011-09-22 23:19 +0200), Matthias Klose wrote: 
>> On 09/22/2011 02:56 PM, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
>>> Package: gcc-4.6
>>> Version: 4.6.1-11
>>> Severity: wishlist
>>> Tags: patch
>>>
>>> Please adopt the patches of ibm-branch.diff etc. on Debian ppc64, too, not only Ubuntu.
>>> When an attached patch is applied, it is confirmed that the package can be built.
>>
>> No. Could you explain, why you want these patches? Some of these are hacks, some
>> of these not suitable, and you seem to enable these not just for ppc64.
>>
> 
> Hmmm,
> Although it might be a thing with an understanding of me to those codes insufficient,
> they were visible to me at the code which utilizes vmx.
> I'm now trying to restart ppc64 port project with supporting vmx instructions.



Hiroyuki asked me to close this report. The hardening flags are now enabled
using dpkg-buildflags; if packages should be built with -O3 by default, this
should be set in dpkg-buildflags as well.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: