Bug#642928: problem with closures on kfreebsd-amd64

[Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>]

could you forward/check in this upstream?

On 09/26/2011 10:33 PM, Petr Salinger wrote:
> user debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
> usertag 642928 + kfreebsd
> usertag 642162 + kfreebsd
> -- 
> 
>> Could be this related to CPU ?
>> My is "Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     E6750"
>> asdfasdf's "AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+"
> 
> After changing configure.ac and propagating it into
> configure, the testsuite of 3.0.11~rc1-2 succeeds
> also on asdfasdf.d.n
> 
>                 === libffi Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes            1649
> # of unsupported tests          15
> 
> 
> --- configure.ac
> +++ configure.ac
> @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@
>                   [Cannot use PROT_EXEC on this target, so, we revert to
>                     alternative means])
>       ;;
> -     *-apple-darwin10* | *-*-freebsd* | *-*-openbsd* | *-pc-solaris*)
> +     *-apple-darwin10* | *-*-freebsd* | *-*-kfreebsd* | *-*-openbsd* |
> *-pc-solaris*)
>         AC_DEFINE(FFI_MMAP_EXEC_WRIT, 1,
>                   [Cannot use malloc on this target, so, we revert to
>                     alternative means])
> 
> 
> IMHO, similar change might help to solve
> "gcj fails under fash.d.o, but not fano.d.o".
> 
> Petr
> 
> 
>