Re: Why cc1 don't link a dynamic ppl.so?

To: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net>
Cc: debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why cc1 don't link a dynamic ppl.so?
From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 16:18:26 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 4E6388B2.9050406@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110904155103.2c32a948a9da081c8c8b6f5f@starynkevitch.net>
References: <[🔎] 20110904155103.2c32a948a9da081c8c8b6f5f@starynkevitch.net>

it is dlopened when graphite is needed. see d/p/gcc-cloog-dl.diff

Reply to:

References:
- Why cc1 don't link a dynamic ppl.so?
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net>

Prev by Date: Why cc1 don't link a dynamic ppl.so?
Next by Date: Bug#640035: FTBFS: maybe Multiarch related regression? fails to find its includes
Previous by thread: Why cc1 don't link a dynamic ppl.so?
Next by thread: Bug#640035: FTBFS: maybe Multiarch related regression? fails to find its includes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread