On 16/08/11 at 22:36 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> tag 635126 + moreinfo help
> are you still working on this, trying to get a test case?
As I wrote in #634260:
n 24/07/11 at 12:19 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 23/07/11 at 12:16 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > builds on sid armhf, and oneiric armel, so this only seems to be
> > triggered in
> > ARM mode. Could you provide a self-contained test case, derived
> > from pack.c?
> Could you check if the upstream bug I was pointed to exhibits the same
> behaviour? That would be an indication that it might be the same bug,
> and that I don't need to spend hours building a test case.