[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#631817: libgcc1: missing link libgccc_s.so -> libgcc_s.so.1



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 631627 gcc-4.6
Bug #631627 [gcc] gcc-defaults version 4:4.4.5-1 non-functional on Wheezy (missing libgcc_s.so)
Bug reassigned from package 'gcc' to 'gcc-4.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions gcc-defaults/1.104.
> reassign 631817 gcc-4.6
Bug #631817 [libgcc1] libgcc1: missing link libgccc_s.so -> libgcc_s.so.1
Bug reassigned from package 'libgcc1' to 'gcc-4.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions gcc-4.6/4.6.0-10.
> severity 631817 grave
Bug #631817 [gcc-4.6] libgcc1: missing link libgccc_s.so -> libgcc_s.so.1
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'

> merge 631627 631817
Bug#631627: gcc-defaults version 4:4.4.5-1 non-functional on Wheezy (missing libgcc_s.so)
Bug#631817: libgcc1: missing link libgccc_s.so -> libgcc_s.so.1
Merged 631627 631817.

> clone 631627 -1
Bug#631627: gcc-defaults version 4:4.4.5-1 non-functional on Wheezy (missing libgcc_s.so)
Bug is marked as being merged with others. Use an existing clone.

> reassign -1 gcc-4.4
Failed to clear fixed versions and reopen on -1: The 'bug' parameter ("-1") to Debbugs::Control::set_package did not pass regex check

	Debbugs::Control::set_package('transcript', 'IO::Scalar=GLOB(0x1b15af0)', 'requester', 'Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>', 'request_addr', 'control@bugs.debian.org', 'request_msgid', '<[🔎] ba0f9e3212d3c92edd73f8ba2ce98470@localhost>', 'request_subject', ...) called at /usr/lib/debbugs/service line 556
	eval {...} called at /usr/lib/debbugs/service line 555

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
-1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=-1
631627: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631627
631817: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631817
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: