[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#609729: marked as done (description of libstdc++6 package is wrong)



Your message dated Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:36:39 +0100
with message-id <4D2CE987.9040009@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#609729: description of libstdc++6 package is wrong
has caused the Debian Bug report #609729,
regarding description of libstdc++6 package is wrong
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
609729: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609729
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libstdc++6
Version: 4.3.2-1.1
Severity: minor

The description of the libstdc++6 package seems to be copied from
libstdc++5, and thus contains incorrect version numbers and info.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.7
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libstdc++6 depends on:
ii  gcc-4.3-base                4.3.2-1.1    The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6                       2.7-18lenny7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1                     1:4.3.2-1.1  GCC support library

libstdc++6 recommends no packages.

libstdc++6 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 12.01.2011 00:09, Jan Claeys wrote:
Package: libstdc++6
Version: 4.3.2-1.1
Severity: minor

The description of the libstdc++6 package seems to be copied from
libstdc++5, and thus contains incorrect version numbers and info.

no. it's correct.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: