Processed (with 1 errors): forwarded gcc reports
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 575451 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR43659
Bug #575451 [gcc-4.5] gcc-4.5: -flto doesn't remember -fPIC
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://gcc.gnu.org/PR43659'.
> tag 575451 + upstream
Bug #575451 [gcc-4.5] gcc-4.5: -flto doesn't remember -fPIC
Added tag(s) upstream.
> retitle 575451 [PR43659] -flto doesn't remember -fPIC
Bug #575451 [gcc-4.5] gcc-4.5: -flto doesn't remember -fPIC
Changed Bug title to '[PR43659] -flto doesn't remember -fPIC' from 'gcc-4.5: -flto doesn't remember -fPIC'
> forwarded 568616 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR43660
Bug #568616 [libstdc++6-4.5-dev] libstdc++6-4.5-dev: range of random-number generator seems wrong/confusing
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://gcc.gnu.org/PR43660'.
> tag 568616 + upstream
Bug #568616 [libstdc++6-4.5-dev] libstdc++6-4.5-dev: range of random-number generator seems wrong/confusing
Added tag(s) upstream.
> retitle 568616 [PR43660] range of random-number generator seems wrong/confusing
Bug #568616 [libstdc++6-4.5-dev] libstdc++6-4.5-dev: range of random-number generator seems wrong/confusing
Changed Bug title to '[PR43660] range of random-number generator seems wrong/confusing' from 'libstdc++6-4.5-dev: range of random-number generator seems wrong/confusing'
> tag 576198 + upstream fixed-upstream
Bug #576198 [gcc-4.4] gcc-4.4: ICE on ia64: in insert_in_history_vect, at sel-sched-ir.c:1514
Added tag(s) upstream and fixed-upstream.
> retitle 576198 [4.4 regression/fixed in 4.5] ICE on ia64: in
Bug #576198 [gcc-4.4] gcc-4.4: ICE on ia64: in insert_in_history_vect, at sel-sched-ir.c:1514
Changed Bug title to '[4.4 regression/fixed in 4.5] ICE on ia64: in' from 'gcc-4.4: ICE on ia64: in insert_in_history_vect, at sel-sched-ir.c:1514'
> insert_in_history_vect, at sel-sched-ir.c:1514
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Reply to: