Bug#581698: similar bug in Ubuntu bugtracker
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> That indeed it is, and I've been aware of it for a while.
> I actually fixed this with the patch in bug 581240 - hitting two birds with
> one stone.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581240#20
> If you have a look, the update addresses two things.
> 1) Create a cgraph node only if a function requires a static chain - we
> don't care if the tree code isn't FUNCTION_DECL.
> 2) Omit frame pointers in naked functions (bug #581240).
>
> I see you raised another bug in libphobos, I'll have a look at that first
> before letting Matthias know to update gdc in sid.
> Regards
> --
> Iain Buclaw
>
> *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
>
I've tried your patch (compiling gdc took 67minutes on my laptop ._.)
and it does indeed fix both bugs for me. Great work :-)
On a side note: It seems like the gdc meta-package in squeeze was
updated recently now depends on gdc-4.3 instead of gdc-4.1 - is gdc
4.3 really stable enough to be the default gdc? I just played around
with D for a few days and discovered two bugs, so it seems to me that
gdc-4.3 is far from being as mature as gdc-4.1 ..
Cheers,
- Daniel
Reply to: