[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#479950: marked as done (java-gcj: java alternative overwritten)



Your message dated Fri,  7 May 2010 18:44:42 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <20100507164442.A05606BA9@getsu.thykier.net>
and subject line Package java-gcj-compat has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #479950,
regarding java-gcj: java alternative overwritten
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
479950: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479950
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.78-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3

*** Please type your report below this line ***

After upgrading my system, a java program failed to run because the java
alternative was overwritten from the previously selected sun java.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages java-gcj-compat depends on:
ii  java-gcj-compat-headless      1.0.78-1   Java runtime environment using GIJ
ii  libgcj9-0-awt                 4.3.0-3    AWT peer runtime libraries for use

java-gcj-compat recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.0.80-5.1+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/479950 in Debian BTS
against the package java-gcj-compat. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/577265. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Niels Thykier


--- End Message ---

Reply to: