Your message dated Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:11:39 +0100 with message-id <dacf4780912231711u134dfa94qcfa3825d08cae1fe@mail.gmail.com> and subject line Re: Bug#542788: ada_no_archs not set by debian/rules* has caused the Debian Bug report #542788, regarding ada_no_archs not set by debian/rules* to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 542788: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542788 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: ada_no_archs not set by debian/rules*
- From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:02:30 +0200
- Message-id: <4A8E7EC6.7050406@debian.org>
Package: gcc-4.4This is only relevant for build where gnat is built as part of gcc-4.4, and for gcc-snapshot builds. Looks like ada_no_archs isn't set/updated.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>, 542788-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#542788: ada_no_archs not set by debian/rules*
- From: Arthur Loiret <aloiret@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:11:39 +0100
- Message-id: <dacf4780912231711u134dfa94qcfa3825d08cae1fe@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: aloiret@debian.org
- In-reply-to: <4A8E7EC6.7050406@debian.org>
- References: <4A8E7EC6.7050406@debian.org>
2009/8/21, Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>: > This is only relevant for build where gnat is built as part of gcc-4.4, and > for > gcc-snapshot builds. Looks like ada_no_archs isn't set/updated. In rules.defs there is: ada_no_cpus := m32r m68k sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb ada_no_systems := gnu knetbsd-gnu And this generates in rules.conf: ada_no_archs = !m32r !m68k !sh3 !sh3eb !sh4 !sh4eb !hurd-i386 !hurd-alpha !knetbsd-i386 !knetbsd-alpha Which seems right. If you want "!arm !armel" to be added to ada_no_archs, I'd suggest you just add "arm" to ada_no_cpus, now this is supported. ;-) Arthur.
--- End Message ---