[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#538647: marked as done (g++-4.3: g++ examines second value to "?" always if it is a template)



Your message dated Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:59:22 +0200
with message-id <87tz100w1h.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#538647: g++-4.3: g++ examines second value to "?" always if it is a template
has caused the Debian Bug report #538647,
regarding g++-4.3: g++ examines second value to "?" always if it is a template
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
538647: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=538647
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: g++-4.3
Version: 4.3.2-1.1
Severity: important


Let an example do the talking

    template< unsigned int result, unsigned int wanted, unsigned int guess >
    struct log2_calculator;

    // Specialisation that ends recursion.
    template< unsigned int result, unsigned int wanted >
    struct log2_calculator< result, wanted, 0>
    {
        enum { value = 0 }; // Invalid.
    };

    template< unsigned int result, unsigned int wanted, unsigned int guess >
    struct log2_calculator
    {
        typedef log2_calculator< result+1, wanted, guess << 1 > next_value_type;
/*HERE*/enum { value = (wanted <= guess) ? result : next_value_type::value };
    };

The intention of this code is to work out log2(a) at compile time, lacking
some other mechanism.

This allows...

    enum { is3 = log2_calculator< 0,  8, 1 >::value };
    enum { is4 = log2_calculator< 0, 16, 1 >::value };
    enum { is6 = log2_calculator< 0, 64, 1 >::value };

....something that's more obviously useful inside templates.

    enum { isX = log2_calculator< 0, sizeof(N)*8, 1 >::value };

Anyway, the problem becomes obvious when you omit the specialisation from the
above - g++ reaches it's template nesting limit because it's instantiating
the template that's the second value to "?" even though the conditional is
true.
I've marked the line above with /*HERE*/.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.2
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages g++-4.3 depends on:
ii  gcc-4.3                   4.3.2-1.1      The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-4.3-base              4.3.2-1.1      The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6                     2.7-18         GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgmp3c2                 2:4.2.2+dfsg-3 Multiprecision arithmetic library
ii  libmpfr1ldbl              2.3.1.dfsg.1-2 multiple precision floating-point 
ii  libstdc++6-4.3-dev        4.3.2-1.1      The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d

g++-4.3 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages g++-4.3 suggests:
ii  g++-4.3-multilib             4.3.2-1.1   The GNU C++ compiler (multilib fil
ii  gcc-4.3-doc                  4.3.2.nf1-1 documentation for the GNU compiler
pn  libstdc++6-4.3-dbg           <none>      (no description available)

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
* Philip Ashmore:

> /*HERE*/enum { value = (wanted <= guess) ? result : next_value_type::value };

Not a bug.  You need to implement your own conditional operator at the
template level to make this work.  The version with ?: is not valid
C++.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: