Bug#523655: gcc-4.3: error: unrecognizable insn on alpha using -O3 and -std=c99
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.3-5
Hi,
r-base is failing to build on alpha with the following error:
gcc -I. -I../../src/include -I../../src/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -mieee-with-inexact -fpic -std=gnu99 -O3 -pipe -g -c deriv.c -o deriv.o
deriv.c: In function 'simplify':
deriv.c:267: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 2103 64 65 9 ../../src/include/Rinlinedfuns.h:86 (set (reg:DI 2 $2)
(const:DI (plus:DI (label_ref:DI 68)
(const_int 24 [0x18])))) -1 (insn_list:REG_LABEL_OPERAND 68 (nil)))
deriv.c:267: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2001
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs> for instructions.
make[4]: *** [deriv.o] Error 1
I've attached a reduced test case that gives a simular error message:
$ gcc-4.3 -std=c99 -O3 -c deriv.i -o deriv.o
deriv.i: In function 'D':
deriv.i:117: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 383 189 190 26 deriv.i:42 (set (reg:DI 2 $2)
(const:DI (plus:DI (label_ref:DI 193)
(const_int 24 [0x18])))) -1 (insn_list:REG_LABEL_OPERAND 193 (nil)))
deriv.i:117: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2001
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs> for instructions.
Note that the error goes away if you do not use -std=gnu99 or -std=c99,
and -O3.
It compiles with gcc-4.1 and 4.2.
Kurt
typedef int R_len_t;
typedef unsigned int SEXPTYPE;
struct sxpinfo_struct {
SEXPTYPE type : 5;
};
struct vecsxp_struct {
R_len_t length;
R_len_t truelength;
};
struct listsxp_struct {
struct SEXPREC *carval;
struct SEXPREC *cdrval;
struct SEXPREC *tagval;
};
typedef struct SEXPREC {
struct sxpinfo_struct sxpinfo;
union {
struct listsxp_struct listsxp;
} u;
} SEXPREC, *SEXP;
typedef struct VECTOR_SEXPREC {
struct vecsxp_struct vecsxp;
} VECTOR_SEXPREC, *VECSEXP;
typedef union { VECTOR_SEXPREC s; double align; } SEXPREC_ALIGN;
extern SEXP R_NilValue;
extern SEXP R_MissingArg;
int Rf_envlength(SEXP rho);
SEXP Rf_protect(SEXP);
const char * Rf_translateChar(SEXP);
inline R_len_t Rf_length(SEXP s)
{
int i;
switch (((s)->sxpinfo.type)) {
case 0:
return 0;
case 24:
return (((VECSEXP) (s))->vecsxp.length);
case 6:
case 17:
i = 0;
while (s != ((void *)0) && s != R_NilValue) {
i++;
s = ((s)->u.listsxp.cdrval);
}
return i;
case 4:
return Rf_envlength(s);
default:
return 1;
}
}
inline SEXP Rf_lang3(SEXP s, SEXP t, SEXP u)
{
return s;
}
typedef SEXP (*CCODE)(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP);
static SEXP PlusSymbol;
static SEXP MinusSymbol;
static SEXP DivideSymbol;
int isZero(SEXP s);
SEXP PP(SEXP s);
SEXP AddParens(SEXP expr);
SEXP Rf_install();
static int isUminus(SEXP s)
{
if (((s)->sxpinfo.type) == 6 && ((s)->u.listsxp.carval) == MinusSymbol) {
switch(Rf_length(s)) {
case 2:
return 1;
case 3:
if (((((((s)->u.listsxp.cdrval))->u.listsxp.cdrval))->u.listsxp.carval) == R_MissingArg)
return 1;
else return 0;
}
}
else return 0;
}
static SEXP simplify(SEXP fun, SEXP arg1, SEXP arg2)
{
SEXP ans;
if (fun == PlusSymbol) {
if (isZero(arg1))
ans = arg2;
else if (isUminus(arg1))
ans = simplify(MinusSymbol, arg2, ((((arg1)->u.listsxp.cdrval))->u.listsxp.carval));
else if (isUminus(arg2))
ans = simplify(MinusSymbol, arg1, ((((arg2)->u.listsxp.cdrval))->u.listsxp.carval));
}
else if (fun == DivideSymbol) {
ans = Rf_lang3(DivideSymbol, arg1, arg2);
}
return ans;
}
static SEXP D(SEXP expr, SEXP var)
{
return simplify(PlusSymbol,
PP(D(((((expr)->u.listsxp.cdrval))->u.listsxp.carval), var)),
PP(D(((((((expr)->u.listsxp.cdrval))->u.listsxp.cdrval))->u.listsxp.carval), var)));
}
SEXP __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden"))) do_D(SEXP call, SEXP op, SEXP args, SEXP env)
{
SEXP expr, var;
var = Rf_install();
expr = ((args)->u.listsxp.carval);
Rf_protect(expr = D(expr, var));
expr = AddParens(expr);
return expr;
}
Reply to: