[Bug preprocessor/11931] unjustified warning for C89 code using HUGE_VAL
------- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-18 01:14 -------
For a long time glibc has used __builtin_huge_val in this definition which
avoids this problem. fixincludes has fixed the definitions from old
glibc to avoid this problem since:
2005-09-15 Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
PR c++/23139
* inclhack.def (huge_val_hex, huge_valf_hex, huge_vall_hex): New
fixes.
* fixincl.x: Regenerate.
* tests/base/bits/huge_val.h: New file.
So the issue described here is fixed and if it shows up elsewhere then the
testcase I added with that patch will show it.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11931
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
Reply to: