[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Bug target/35659] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Miscompiled code with -O2 (but not with -O2 -funroll-loops) on ia64




------- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-24 15:04 -------
Even smaller reproducer:
      PROGRAM PR35659
      DIMENSION A(1000), B(1010), AUX(8), IPIV(8), X(16)
      COMMON /TLSDIM/ M1,M,N,L,IER
      COMMON /SLATE/ V1,V2,IAR(24),DUM(14)
      DATA A/0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 2, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0.200000003,
     1  0.0399999991, 0.00800000038, 1, 0.400000006, 0.159999996,
     2  0.064000003, 1, 0.600000024, 0.360000014, 0.216000006, 1,
     3  0.800000012, 0.639999986, 0.512000024, 1, 1, 1, 1, 968*0./
      DATA B/1, 2, 1, 1.22140002, 1.49179995, 1.82210004,
     4  2.22550011, 2.7183001, 0, 0, 1000*0./
      M1 = 2
      M = 8
      N = 4
      L = 1
      IER = 0
      V1 = 0
      V2 = 1.40129846e-45
      IAR(:) = 538976288
      DUM(:) = 1.35631564e-19
      CALL TLSC(A,B,AUX,IPIV,1.,X)
      END
      SUBROUTINE TLSMSQ (B,L,M,F)
      DIMENSION      B(*)
      IF (M.NE.2) CALL ABORT
      STOP 0
      END
      SUBROUTINE TLSWOP (A,AD,N,NR)
      DIMENSION      A(*), AD(*)
      CALL ABORT
      END
      SUBROUTINE TLUK (A,IASEP,NR,SIG,BETA)
      DIMENSION A(*)
      CALL ABORT
      END
      SUBROUTINE TLSTEP (A,B,IASEP,IBSEP,NR,NC,BETA)
      DIMENSION      A(*), B(*)
      CALL ABORT
      END

The miscompiled TLSC calls the first TLSMSQ routine with 8.0 rather than 2.0
as the 3rd argument.


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2008-06-24 15:04:50
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35659

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


Reply to: