Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:00:03 +0100 with message-id <20081218120003.GF2636@laura.lri.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#507405: gcc-snapshot: builds with -mtune=i486 by default has caused the Debian Bug report #507405, regarding gcc-snapshot: builds with -mtune=i486 by default to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 507405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507405 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: gcc-snapshot: builds with -mtune=i486 by default
- From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:55:31 +0100
- Message-id: <20081130225530.15194.55062.reportbug@trofast.sesse.net>
Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20081117-1 Severity: normal Hi, I compared performance of gcc-4.3 and gcc-snapshot today, and there was at least once quite bad regression. I reported it upstream, and the root cause was that gcc-snapshot builds with -mtune=i486 and gcc-4.3 builds with -mtune=generic. Could this be changed so the two packages match, and it would be easier to compare the generated code?
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>, 507405-close@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#507405: gcc-snapshot: builds with -mtune=i486 by default
- From: Arthur Loiret <arthur.loiret@u-psud.fr>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:00:03 +0100
- Message-id: <20081218120003.GF2636@laura.lri.fr>
- Reply-to: Arthur Loiret <arthur.loiret@u-psud.fr>
- In-reply-to: <20081130225530.15194.55062.reportbug@trofast.sesse.net>
- References: <20081130225530.15194.55062.reportbug@trofast.sesse.net>
Hi, On amd64 and i386, gcc-4.3 and gcc-snapshot are both configured with --mtune=generic, and: arthur@gcc16:~$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -v hello.c 2>&1 | grep cc1 /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.4.0/cc1 -quiet -v hello.c -quiet -dumpbase hello.c -mtune=generic -auxbase hello -version -o /tmp/ccy2bdJj.s arthur@gcc16:~$ gcc-4.3 -v hello.c 2>&1 | grep cc1 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.3.2/cc1 -quiet -v hello.c -quiet -dumpbase hello.c -mtune=generic -auxbase hello -version -o /tmp/ccJOrDav.s it runs cc1 with -mtune=generic. But you still can add -mtune=foo to the command line if you want to change the default. Closing. On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:55:31PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > Package: gcc-snapshot > Version: 20081117-1 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > I compared performance of gcc-4.3 and gcc-snapshot today, and there was at least > once quite bad regression. I reported it upstream, and the root cause was that > gcc-snapshot builds with -mtune=i486 and gcc-4.3 builds with -mtune=generic. > Could this be changed so the two packages match, and it would be easier to > compare the generated code? > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.orgAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---