Your message dated Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:23:17 +0200 with message-id <20080609092317.GA4660@PC23> and subject line Re: gcc: Inlined strlen() could be smarter has caused the Debian Bug report #86251, regarding [PR optimization/3511]: Inlined strlen() could be smarter to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 86251: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=86251 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: gcc: Inlined strlen() could be smarter
- From: <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:30:30 +1100
- Message-id: <200102170130.f1H1UUa23800@gondor.apana.org.au>
Package: gcc Version: 1:2.95.3-5 Severity: wishlist gcc -S -O2 on the file #include <string.h> size_t mystrlen(const char *s) { if (!s) { s = ""; } return strlen(s); } generates (on i386) .file "a.c" .version "01.01" gcc2_compiled.: .section .rodata .LC0: .string "" .text .align 4 .globl mystrlen .type mystrlen,@function mystrlen: pushl %ebp movl %esp,%ebp pushl %edi movl 8(%ebp),%edi testl %edi,%edi jne .L142 movl $.LC0,%edi .L142: movb $0,%al cld movl $-1,%ecx repnz scasb notl %ecx leal -1(%ecx),%eax popl %edi leave ret .Lfe1: .size mystrlen,.Lfe1-mystrlen .ident "GCC: (GNU) 2.95.3 20010125 (prerelease)" As you can see, strlen() is not optimised out in the !pat case. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux gondor 2.2.17 #1 Mon Sep 11 22:22:16 EST 2000 i586 unknown Versions of the packages gcc depends on: ii cpp 2.95.3-5 The GNU C preprocessor. ii cpp-2.95 2.95.3-4 The GNU C preprocessor. ii gcc-2.95 2.95.3-4 The GNU C compiler.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, 86251-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: gcc: Inlined strlen() could be smarter
- From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:23:17 +0200
- Message-id: <20080609092317.GA4660@PC23>
- In-reply-to: <200102170130.f1H1UUa23800@gondor.apana.org.au>
- References: <200102170130.f1H1UUa23800@gondor.apana.org.au>
Version: 4.3.1-1 On 17.02.01 herbert@gondor.apana.org.au (herbert@gondor.apana.org.au) wrote: > Package: gcc > Version: 1:2.95.3-5 > Severity: wishlist > > gcc -S -O2 on the file > > As you can see, strlen() is not optimised out in the !pat case. > changelog from latest gcc: gcc-4.3 (4.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=high * Closing reports reported against gcc-4.0 and fixed in gcc-4.3: - General + Fix PR optimization/3511, inlined strlen() could be smarter. Close: #86251. BTS seems not be able to handle the missing "s" -> Closing manually. H. -- sigmentation fault
--- End Message ---