[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#472867: more simplier loop (asm x86 corrected)



* Cyprien LAPLACE:

>> This is still undefined.  If you need machine address arithmetic, you
>> should use uintptr_t and hope for the best.

> Does it mean that the loop indexed on an integer should become an
> infinite loop ?

Not necessarily.  However, the compiler may assume that foo() performs a
non-local exit before invalid pointer arithmetic occurs.



Reply to: