[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#474276: marked as done (testsuite failures on arm)



Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2008 21:18:17 +0200
with message-id <18422.32505.168568.297363@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Re: Bug#474276: testsuite failures on arm
has caused the Debian Bug report #474276,
regarding testsuite failures on arm
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
474276: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=474276
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libffi
Version: 3.0.4-2

There are testsuite failures when building on ARM (which are then ignored...)

Running /home/martin/arm/arma/libffi-3.0.4/testsuite/libffi.call/call.exp ...
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_2byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3_1byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte1.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_4_1byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_4byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/struct5.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
... followed by the same reports for -O2, -O3, -Os,
"-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer"

Interestingly, these specific tests all succeed under the new armel
port (ARM EABI).



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tag 474276 + wontfix
thanks

Martin Guy writes:
> Package: libffi
> Version: 3.0.4-2
> 
> There are testsuite failures when building on ARM (which are then ignored...)
> 
> Running /home/martin/arm/arma/libffi-3.0.4/testsuite/libffi.call/call.exp ...
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_2byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3_1byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte1.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_4_1byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_4byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
> FAIL: libffi.call/struct5.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
> ... followed by the same reports for -O2, -O3, -Os,
> "-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer"
> 
> Interestingly, these specific tests all succeed under the new armel
> port (ARM EABI).

these are expected to fail. closure support won't be implemented
anymore for the old ARM ABI.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: