[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#474075: java-gcj-compat: Should not Provide: java5-runtime-headless



Package: java-gcj-compat-headless
Version: 1.0.77-4
Severity: important

Hello,

This bug is related to #471837 against tex4ht which I maintain.
I am planning to close that report by replacing the existing Suggests
with "Suggests: sun-java5-jre | java5-runtime-headless".

Here is the information that is relevant to the maintainers of
java-gcj-compat.

A .jar that was compiled with java-gcj-compat-dev fails to run
to completion with "/usr/bin/java" as installed by this package.

The same .jar runs fine with sun-java5-jre.

To reproduce the error you can download
  http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/problems/xtpipes_failed.tar.gz
After unpacking the files and changing to the unpacked directory, you run
  java -jar ./tex4ht.jar xtpipes -i ./xtpipes/ -o junk.out xtpipes_failed.tmp
You can also use "-trace" option to xtpipes to get more information.

Regards,

Kapil.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages java-gcj-compat-headless depends on:
ii  fastjar                       2:0.95-1   Jar creation utility
ii  gij-4.3                       4.3.0-1    The GNU Java bytecode interpreter
ii  java-common                   0.27       Base of all Java packages
ii  libgcj-bc                     4.3-1      Link time only library for use wit
ii  libgcj9-jar                   4.3.0-1    Java runtime library for use with 
ii  libmx4j-java                  3.0.2-1    An open source implementation of t

Versions of packages java-gcj-compat-headless recommends:
pn  java-gcj-compat               <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: