[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Bug c/35489] Inaccurate GCC documentation




------- Comment #2 from adam at irvine dot com  2008-03-07 00:08 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> > but others are
> actual bugs in which the compiler is generating incorrect instructions
> (such as #12331);
> 
> That is not incorrect instructions.  Just different than what you are
> expecting. 

I suppose that if the chip has an instruction that would allow it to store the
correct value without losing any precision, and the compiler instead chooses to
generate an instruction that causes the computation to lose precision, that
could be considered "different than what I am expecting", yes.

Actually, I like that response.  I might try to use it myself next time one of
our customers reports a problem.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35489

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


Reply to: