On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:44 -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! > > Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> writes: > > > * Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com> [2008-01-02 16:55]: > > > Is EABI the old arm, or the new? Couldn't this make a difference? > > > > I can reproduce the problem with the old ABI (i.e. the current port in > > Debian). I'll open a bug report with GCC. > > Thank you! > > Are we going to have two arm ports, or is the old one going away for > lenny? > There are a lot of devices that need support from the existing Debian arm port as well as newer devices that need the new ABI. There is a possible method for combining the two but both will be needed - and probably for some time after Lenny. Contact debian-arm for more info. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part