[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#440259: marked as done (java-gcj-compat-dev: /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java is a dangling symlink)



Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:32:03 +0000
with message-id <E1IR5fP-0007qq-39@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#440259: fixed in ecj 3.3.0+0728-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Version: 1.0.76-5

/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java points to /usr/bin/ecj, which is not
provided by any of the dependencies.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ecj
Source-Version: 3.3.0+0728-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ecj, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ecj-gcj_3.3.0+0728-3_hppa.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecj/ecj-gcj_3.3.0+0728-3_hppa.deb
ecj-gcj_3.3.0+0728-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecj/ecj-gcj_3.3.0+0728-3_i386.deb
ecj_3.3.0+0728-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/ecj/ecj_3.3.0+0728-3.diff.gz
ecj_3.3.0+0728-3.dsc
  to pool/main/e/ecj/ecj_3.3.0+0728-3.dsc
ecj_3.3.0+0728-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecj/ecj_3.3.0+0728-3_all.deb
libecj-java-gcj_3.3.0+0728-3_hppa.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecj/libecj-java-gcj_3.3.0+0728-3_hppa.deb
libecj-java-gcj_3.3.0+0728-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecj/libecj-java-gcj_3.3.0+0728-3_i386.deb
libecj-java_3.3.0+0728-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecj/libecj-java_3.3.0+0728-3_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 440259@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> (supplier of updated ecj package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:33:08 +0200
Source: ecj
Binary: libecj-java ecj ecj1 libecj-java-gcj ecj-gcj
Architecture: all hppa i386 source 
Version: 3.3.0+0728-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Description: 
 ecj-gcj    - standalone version of the Eclipse Java compiler (native version)
 libecj-java-gcj - Eclipse Java compiler (native library)
Closes: 440259
Changes: 
 ecj (3.3.0+0728-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Use ecj-standalone.jar to build the ecj-gcj and ecj1 binaries.
   * ecj-gcj: Depend on ecj. Closes: #440259.
Files: 
 0bb7b934eee8ed179fcc33f6bfd37ca3 2071762 libs optional libecj-java-gcj_3.3.0+0728-3_hppa.deb
 080fa32aa49e4cbe33610e7773fdbea9 1015 devel optional ecj_3.3.0+0728-3.dsc
 7ae85e200c8807f887fd89151d5b7729 1690322 devel optional ecj-gcj_3.3.0+0728-3_hppa.deb
 8fec4682149f91957ea56598f30b6069 13472 devel optional ecj_3.3.0+0728-3_all.deb
 a408aab7931065776ef2d256381a2dfe 1442578 libs optional libecj-java-gcj_3.3.0+0728-3_i386.deb
 c08639496d2ce306fdb4990bfcb58a78 25898 devel optional ecj_3.3.0+0728-3.diff.gz
 c8db34e8d17d491ce779c532069dceb5 1355060 devel optional ecj-gcj_3.3.0+0728-3_i386.deb
 ec30d7b5db38037876444148fd090408 1157518 libs optional libecj-java_3.3.0+0728-3_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG2AaxStlRaw+TLJwRAjBVAJ4gsLkPciI5qUSTmga8l6DvCrcYVACfW86x
0UDkbghJJQO05QXmSNgdOzw=
=6Cix
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---

Reply to: