[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#392054: marked as done (arm-specific failure)



Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:05:07 +0200
with message-id <20070428100506.GA24188@deprecation.cyrius.com>
and subject line Bug#392054: ginac: FTBFS on arm
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: g++-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-15

According to
<http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=ginac&ver=1.3.5-2&arch=arm&stamp=1160247427&file=log>
the current GiNaC package FTBFS on arm.

This is after the workaround for another arm-specific failure (c.f.
Bug#390620) was put in the source package. Apparently, that was not
the only failure. Note, that this time, a module compiled with
-fPIC -DPIC, but not without it.

--
 .''`.  Richard B. Kreckel
: :' :  <kreckel@debian.org>
`. `'   <kreckel@ginac.de>
  `-    <http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
* Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> [2007-04-19 17:36]:
> > > Setting CXXFLAGS to -O instead of -O2 at least makde the package 
> > > compile. (I don't suppose that g++-4.1_4.1.1-16 made a difference.)
> > 
> > It compiles fine on my ARM box with -O2, using 4.1.1-13+b1 and 4.1.1-16.
> > 
> > I suspect a temporary problem.
> 
> I guess you could trying removing the CXXFLAGS workaround to see if it
> compiles.

... or leaving it at -O1 since it doesn't really matter.

In any case, I'm closing this bug report since it's not a GCC bug.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

--- End Message ---

Reply to: