Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613
- To: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>, 428582@bugs.debian.org, Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>, Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>, 428582-submitter@bugs.debian.org, debian-gcc@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613
- From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 07:35:19 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20071101063518.GA22815@glandium.org>
- Mail-followup-to: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>, 428582@bugs.debian.org, Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>, Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>, 428582-submitter@bugs.debian.org, debian-gcc@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20070911053759.GA10798@glandium.org>
- References: <18032.15252.500061.515361@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20070705185553.GA32193@glandium.org> <20070705190615.GB18755@dario.dodds.net> <20070705192717.GA24487@networkno.de> <20070911033331.GA24380@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> <20070911053759.GA10798@glandium.org>
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 07:37:59AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:33:31AM +0000, brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> wrote:
> > [CC'd to debian-mips.]
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:27:20PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
> > > > > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> > > > > > miss another backport from the trunk.
> > > >
> > > > > Did someone check already ?
> > > >
> > > > Probably not; this discussion doesn't seem to be cc:ed to debian-mips?
> > >
> > > Plain upstream gcc head appears to work, gcc-snapshot fails to build
> > > with ICE. I hope to have time for it mid of next week.
> >
> > Is there any news on this? gcc-snapshot is fixed (it built on mips),
> > and gcc-4.2 is the default compiler (although it still has problems:
> > #441633).
> >
> > Could someone check and see if xulrunner now builds with gcc-4.2 or
> > gcc-snapshot and report back?
>
> FWIW, iceape failed to build with gcc-4.2 with the same exact error that
> xulrunner had, so xulrunner is likely to fail too. Note that as is,
> xulrunner can't build with gcc-4.2 due to other visibility problems.
It seems iceape and iceweasel finally built on mips. I'll give a shot
with xulrunner.
Mike
Reply to: