[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#434632: marked as done ([powerpc] generate broken 64-bit binaries)



Your message dated Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:43:17 +0200
with message-id <20070726164317.GA367@hall.aurel32.net>
and subject line Bug#434626: [powerpc] broken 64bit packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libc6-ppc64
Version: 2.6-3
Severity: serious

Seen while rebuilding gcc-4.2 / gcj-4.2; 64bit configure tests fail
with a segfault. Reverting to 2.6-2 lets the bootstrap succeed.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 02:30:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> clone 434626 -1
> reassign -1 gcc-4.2
> retitle -1 [powerpc] generate broken 64-bit binaries
> thanks
> 
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 01:18:43PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Package: libc6-ppc64
> > Version: 2.6-3
> > Severity: serious
> > 
> > Seen while rebuilding gcc-4.2 / gcj-4.2; 64bit configure tests fail
> > with a segfault. Reverting to 2.6-2 lets the bootstrap succeed.
> 
> The only significant difference between 2.6-2 and 2.6-3 is that we use
> gcc-4.2 to build the glibc. So it looks like gcc-4.2 is broken.
> 
> We will switch back to gcc-4.1 for powerpc.

This is actually a problem with glibc, which make too much assumptions on
the generated assembly code.

Closing the bug.

-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net

--- End Message ---

Reply to: