Bug#427278: gcc-4.2-base: should it better be arch: all?

[Martin Koeppe <mkoeppe@gmx.de>]

Package: gcc-4.2-base
Version: 4.2-20070528-1
Severity: normal

When I look at the content of gcc-4.2-base I wonder if it should 
better be arch: all instead of arch: any. Are there reasons for arch: 
any? I'm porting to a new architecture and for me it would be useful 
to have it arch: all, because gcc-4.2-source depends on it and is also 
arch: all.

Martin