[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#427278: gcc-4.2-base: should it better be arch: all?

Package: gcc-4.2-base
Version: 4.2-20070528-1
Severity: normal

When I look at the content of gcc-4.2-base I wonder if it should better be arch: all instead of arch: any. Are there reasons for arch: any? I'm porting to a new architecture and for me it would be useful to have it arch: all, because gcc-4.2-source depends on it and is also arch: all.


Reply to: