Bug#426587: gcc-4.1 compiled code links on x86, but not x86-64
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.2-8
Severity: important
Code that compiles/links fine on an x86 platform, using PIE fails to
link on amd64 - looks like crt1.o wasn't built -fPIC on amd
$ cc -g -Wall -O2 -fstack-protector-all -z relro -z now -fPIE
-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-pie -Wl,--warn-shared-textrel version.c
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1.3/../../../../lib/crt1.o:
relocation R_X86_64_32S against `__libc_csu_fini' can not be used when
making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1.3/../../../../lib/crt1.o: could not
read symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Just for giggles, change -fPIE to -fPIC
$ cc -g -Wall -O2 -fstack-protector-all -z relro -z now -fPIC
-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-pie -Wl,--warn-shared-textrel version.c
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1.3/../../../../lib/crt1.o:
relocation R_X86_64_32S against `__libc_csu_fini' can not be used when
making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1.3/../../../../lib/crt1.o: could not
read symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-rc7 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages gcc-4.1 depends on:
ii binutils 2.17cvs20070426-8 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp-4.1 4.1.2-8 The GNU C preprocessor
ii gcc-4.1-base 4.1.2-8 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.5-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libgcc1 1:4.2-20070525-1 GCC support library
Versions of packages gcc-4.1 recommends:
ii libc6-dev 2.5-9 GNU C Library: Development Librari
pn libmudflap0-dev <none> (no description available)
-- no debconf information
Reply to: