Re: FW: RE gcc plans for the lenny cycle
Ludovic Brenta writes:
> Matthias Klose writes:
> > peter green writes:
> >> >Next GCC 4.2 will be prepared to be included in unstable; a current
> >> >issue is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 which has
> >> >to be resolved before g++-4.2 can enter unstable.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> That bug is marked as "resolved invalid" with a reply "Those symbols are
> >> for glibc. Why do they have libstdc++ version names? I think it is a gcc
> >> bug. Please open a gcc bug instead."
> >>
> >> Does anyone know if such a bug has been filed and if so where?
> >
> > the upstream gcc-4_1-branch doesn't include the ldbl changes.
>
> So? Does that mean the bug doesn't affect GCC 4.1? In that case, I
> believe Peter is correct that the bug must be resolved before GCC 4.2
> can enter unstable. Do you agree?
see above. what needs clarifying? if you have any pointers where the
problem actually is, please say so.
Reply to: