[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#407170: marked as done (incompatibility between gfortran and gtkmm in debian testing)



Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2007 07:07:44 +0100
with message-id <45B454B0.9080606@yahoo.fr>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gfortran
Version: 4:4.1.1-15

Package: libgtkmm-2.4-dev
Version: 1:2.8.8-1

The 3 files of test case I send you give a " Internal Error: printf is broken"

When : always on debian testing. (works fine on gentoo with gtkmm 2.8.3 and gfortran 4.1.1-r1) It works normally if you comment out " Gtk::Main kit(argc, argv);" in principal.cc

I don't know if it is a gfortran problem, a gtkmm problem, or a debian packaging problem.

Eric


#include <gtkmm.h>

extern "C" { 
void sub_();
}

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
	Gtk::Main kit(argc, argv);
//	Gtk::Window window;
//	Gtk::Main::run(window); //Shows the window and returns when it is closed.
	sub_();
	return 0;
}
	SUBROUTINE sub()
	implicit none
	double precision a,b,c
	a=100.1
	b=200.2
	c=(a+b)/2
	write(*,*) "value=",a,b,c
	end

	END
all: $(OBJETS)
	gfortran sub.f -c
	g++ principal.cc -O2 *.o -lgfortran `pkg-config gtkmm-2.4 --libs --cflags` -o test

clean:
	rm -f *.o

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
locale issue


	

	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface révolutionnaire.
http://fr.mail.yahoo.com


--- End Message ---

Reply to: