Bug#181096: [Bug tree-optimization/9814] gcc fails to optimise if (l&2) l|=2 away

To: 181096@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#181096: [Bug tree-optimization/9814] gcc fails to optimise if (l&2) l|=2 away
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: 15 Nov 2006 08:38:04 -0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20061115083804.22017.qmail@sourceware.org>
Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org, 181096@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <bug-9814-5514@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-9814-5514@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


-- 
Bug 9814 depends on bug 29797, which changed state.

Bug 29797 Summary: [4.1/4.2 Regression] Miscompiles bit test / set in OpenOffice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29797

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9814

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.

Reply to:

Prev by Date: [Bug target/29825] [4.1 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
Next by Date: [Bug target/29825] [4.1 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
Previous by thread: Bug#181096: [Bug tree-optimization/9814] gcc fails to optimise if (l&2) l|=2 away
Next by thread: Bug#181096: [Bug tree-optimization/9814] gcc fails to optimise if (l&2) l|=2 away
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread