Bug#280803: Removing GFDL'ed docs from gcc-4.0 packages

[Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>]

Frank =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=BCster?= writes:
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> what's up with these bugs (280803 and 321780, 321781, 321782)?  Can you
> provide the patches you used to split out the docs from gcc-4.1?  I
> think we would need the patches corresponding to these changelog
> entries:
> 
> gcc-4.1 (4.1.1ds1-12) unstable; urgency=medium
> 
>   [Matthias Klose]
> [...]
>   * Build without GFDL licensed docs. Closes: #384036.
>     - debian/patches/{svn-doc-updates,pr25524-doc,pr26885-doc}.dpatch:
>       Split out -doc specific patches.
>     - debian/*.texi, debian/porting.html: Add dummy documentation.
>     - debian/rules.unpack, debian/rules.patch: Update for non-gfdl build.
>     - fastjar.texi: Directly define the gcctabopt and gccoptlist macros.
> 
> and 
> 
> gcc-4.1 (4.1.1-11) unstable; urgency=low
> 
>   [Matthias Klose]
> [...]
>   * Do not build the -doc packages and derived manual pages licensed under
>     the GFDL with invariant sections or cover texts.
> 
> Can you provide these patches, so that we can start working from them?

all these patches are available in the gcccvs repository at
svn.debian.org. I didn't start working on these.

  Matthias